You are sitting in front of e-QIP. Section 19 just loaded. The screen asks about your foreign contacts over the last seven years.

Your stomach drops. Because you have some.

Maybe your spouse has relatives back in Manila. Maybe your old college roommate moved back to Seoul and you still text on WhatsApp. Maybe you have a vendor in Berlin you email twice a month. You are not a spy. But you have heard the rumor that listing foreign contacts kills clearances.

So you sit there. Cursor blinking. Wondering if you should just leave it blank.

Stop. Do not leave it blank. That is the move that kills your case.

This article walks you through Section 19 the way it actually works. What counts as a foreign contact. What does not. How to list one cleanly so the investigator does not extend your case by months. And what the adjudicator is really weighing when they review what you wrote.

The fear is overblown. The fix is simple. Let''s get into it.

What is SF-86 Section 19 Asking?

SF-86 Section 19 is titled "Foreign Contacts." Not Section 18 (that is Relatives). Not Section 20 (that is Foreign Activities). Section 19 lives in its own lane.

The form asks you about contact with foreign nationals over the last seven years. Specifically, it wants people you have "close and/or continuing contact" with. That is the magic phrase. Everything in Section 19 hinges on it.

Here is how the form itself defines that phrase. A relationship is "close and/or continuing" when you are bound by:

• Affection
• Influence
• Common interests
• Obligation

That covers a lot of people. It is meant to. But it does not cover everyone you have ever sent an email to.

The form also tells you what type of contact counts: in-person, written, telephone, and electronic. Text, WhatsApp, Signal, email, LinkedIn DMs. All of it.

What does NOT count is the one-off. The hotel front desk clerk in Madrid. The taxi driver in Tokyo. A vendor you emailed once. A foreign national who sat next to you on a flight. Those are not Section 19 entries.

The difference is the bond. A bond of affection, influence, common interest, or obligation. If none of those four exist, you do not list them.

What Counts as a Section 19 Foreign Contact?

Four buckets of relationships confuse people the most. Let''s walk through each.

Bucket 1: Your spouse''s foreign-national relatives

Your wife is a U.S. citizen. Her parents live in the Philippines. You see them every two years for a wedding or a funeral.

Are they Section 19 contacts? Yes, in most cases. You have an obligation through your spouse. You see them in person. You probably exchange Christmas messages. The bond is real.

Note this is separate from Section 18 (Relatives), which asks about your own relatives by blood or marriage. Your wife''s parents go in Section 18 AND Section 19. Same person. Two different sections.

Bucket 2: Old college friends from abroad

Your dorm roommate moved back to South Korea five years ago. You still text once a month. You followed his wedding on Instagram.

That is Section 19. You are bound by affection. You have continuing contact. The fact that he lives in Seoul and not Sacramento is the only thing that matters here.

If you have not spoken in three years and you only liked one of his posts last summer? That is the gray zone. The seven-year clock matters here too. If the last meaningful contact was outside seven years, you do not need to list him.

Bucket 3: Professional foreign-business contacts

You work in IT. You email a vendor in Germany every other week. You have done two work calls with them. You have never met in person.

Probably not Section 19. A pure vendor relationship is a common-interest bond only if it is repeated and meaningful. Two work calls and standard email is not it. But if you have been working with the same person for three years and you sometimes ask about their kids? That tips into Section 19 territory.

When in doubt, list them. Investigators do not punish you for being thorough. They punish you for hiding.

Bucket 4: Dating-app and online relationships

This one trips people up the most. You met someone on a dating app. They live in another country. You video-call twice a week. You have never met in person.

That is absolutely Section 19. You are bound by affection. The contact is continuing. The fact that you have not met physically does not change the analysis. The form lists electronic contact as a type that counts.

Same logic for online gaming friends from overseas, foreign nationals you talk to in Discord, foreign penpals. If you would call them a friend, you list them.

Bradley Landed a GS Management & Program Analyst Role.

"BMR assisted me with the federal resume and made the translations from military jargon to civilian language so easy."
— Bradley, E-8, Army

Read their story →

OPM data built in — goes beyond the job announcement Full 2-page federal format for USAJOBS Tailored to every GS position you apply for

Get My Free Resume

2 free tailored resumes, cover letters & LinkedIn optimization

What Does NOT Count?

The list of things that do NOT trigger Section 19 is shorter but useful. None of the following are Section 19 contacts:

• A one-time meeting at a conference
• A bartender or hotel clerk during travel
• A taxi driver, restaurant server, tour guide
• A foreign national you sat next to on a plane
• An online seller you bought one item from
• A vendor you exchanged two emails with over a project
• A foreign national who friend-requested you on social media but you do not actually engage with

The line is the bond. A one-time professional or transactional encounter does not create a bond of affection, influence, common interest, or obligation. So it does not belong in Section 19.

If you are still unsure after reading the four buckets above, here is the safest rule. Ask yourself: "If a foreign intelligence service wanted to pressure me, would this person be a way in?" If the answer is yes, list them. If the answer is clearly no, skip them.

Will Listing Foreign Contacts Deny My Clearance?

This is the fear that drives most of the bad decisions. So let''s settle it.

Listing a foreign contact does not automatically deny your clearance. Investigators are not allergic to foreign contacts. They are allergic to people who hide them.

From the hiring side of the desk on positions in my federal chain, the SF-86s that came back fast had clean Section 19s. Not because the applicant had no foreign contacts. Because they listed them right.

The applications that stalled? Those were the ones where social media or a background interview surfaced a foreign contact the applicant did not put on the form. That is when things get bad. That is what triggers extra investigation, interviews, and sometimes a denial.

The legal stakes for omitting on purpose are real. Lying on a federal form like the SF-86 can be charged under 18 USC § 1001 as making a false statement. That carries up to five years of prison. Even a much lighter administrative finding of falsification ends most clearance cases on the spot.

So the math is simple. List the contact and accept a possible follow-up question. Or hide the contact and risk a denial plus a criminal exposure. Listing wins every time.

What Information Must You Provide for Each Contact?

Once you decide to list someone, the form wants a baseline of detail. You cannot just write a name and move on. Section 19 asks for:

• Full name and any other names used
• Date of birth (if known)
• Country or countries of citizenship
• Country of current residence
• Methods of contact (in person, telephone, written, electronic)
• Frequency of contact
• Nature and approximate dates of the relationship
• Any government, military, or intelligence affiliation, if known

"If known" is the magic phrase on a few of these. You do not have to invent answers you do not have. If you do not know your friend''s exact date of birth, you can write "approximately 1985" or "month and year not recalled." Investigators understand. What they do not understand is a blank box where you actually do know.

The "frequency of contact" field also trips people up. Write it in plain English. "Twice a year by text." "Monthly video calls." "Every few months by email." Do not try to count exact messages.

What Happens After You List Someone?

The biggest fear after omission is that the investigator will go interview your foreign contact. That sounds scary. Cousins in Mexico. Old roommates in Korea. The Federal Bureau of Investigation knocking on their door.

The investigation tier matters.

For a Tier 3 investigation (Secret or Confidential), investigators do not typically interview foreign nationals overseas. The investigation is mostly records-based. Your Section 19 entries get reviewed, run against databases, and adjudicated against the guidelines. Your contacts almost never hear from the U.S. government.

For a Tier 5 investigation (Top Secret and TS/SCI), the bar is higher. Investigators may try to interview close foreign contacts. May. Not always. They use risk-based judgment. A foreign spouse''s parents are more likely to come up than your college roommate from Toronto.

You can read more about the difference between investigation tiers in our breakdown of Tier 3 vs Tier 5 investigations. The short version is that Tier 5 is more thorough and slower.

For the Background Investigation timeline, see our piece on how long the clearance investigation takes. Foreign contacts are one of the top reasons cases extend.

What Are Adjudicators Actually Looking For?

After the investigation finishes, an adjudicator reviews your case. They are guided by Security Executive Agent Directive 4, or SEAD-4. It contains 13 national security adjudicative guidelines. Foreign contacts fall under Guideline B (Foreign Influence).

You can review the full Guideline B text on the SEAD 4 Adjudicative Guidelines (ODNI). The plain-English version is this.

Adjudicators worry about three things under Guideline B:

1. Divided allegiance. Could your foreign ties pull you toward another country''s interests over the U.S.?
2. Coercion or pressure. Could a foreign government threaten or manipulate your contact to pressure you?
3. Vulnerability to exploitation. Could a foreign intelligence service use the relationship as an access point?

The disqualifying conditions are specific. Family or close ties to a citizen of a foreign country. Sharing living quarters with a foreign national in a way that creates exposure. Connections to foreign government employees. Failing to report when required. Unauthorized contact with known intelligence collaborators.

Read those again. None of them say "having any foreign contact is disqualifying." They focus on specific risk factors. A long-term spouse with U.S. citizenship and family in a friendly country is very different from a cousin in a hostile state who works for their intelligence service. Adjudicators know the difference.

Guideline B also lists mitigating conditions. These are the reasons a foreign contact does NOT become a disqualifier. They include:

• The nature of the foreign country (allies versus adversaries)
• The depth and length of your loyalty to the U.S.
• Your willingness to report contacts as required
• The absence of any indication you would be vulnerable to pressure

You build mitigation by being thorough and honest. The clean answer is its own mitigation.

How Do I Write a Clean Section 19 Entry?

You have decided to list someone. Now write the entry so it does not extend your case by months. Here are the rules I have seen work.

Be specific. "I met him at university in 2010. He moved back to South Korea in 2014. We text on KakaoTalk roughly once a month. I have not visited him in person since 2018." That paragraph answers half the investigator''s follow-up questions before they ask.

Do not minimize. If you talk to your spouse''s mother weekly, do not write "occasional contact." Investigators verify against phone records and social media. A mismatch between what you wrote and what they find triggers more scrutiny.

Do not editorialize. Skip "she is a great person and would never do anything bad." Just give facts. The adjudicator weighs the facts.

List affiliations. If you know your contact works for a foreign government, military, or intelligence service, say so. Hiding this is the single fastest way to a denial. If they work for a private company, say which one.

Do not bury entries. If you have five Section 19 contacts, list all five. Do not list three and hope they miss the other two. They will not miss them.

For the broader timeline on what e-QIP submission looks like after you finish the form, see our walkthrough of e-QIP background investigation prep.

Where Does Section 19 Sit in the Bigger SF-86 Picture?

Section 19 is one piece. The SF-86 has several other sections that interact with it.

• Section 10 (Dual or Foreign Citizenship) covers you, not your contacts. List any foreign citizenship you hold or held.
• Section 18 (Relatives) covers your own family. A foreign-national parent or sibling goes here. They may also go in Section 19 if you have ongoing contact.
• Section 20A (Foreign Activities) covers foreign business interests, financial holdings, and benefits.
• Section 20B (Foreign Business, Professional Activities, and Government Contacts) covers consulting, employment, or sponsorship by a foreign entity.
• Section 20C (Foreign Travel) covers travel outside the U.S. in the last seven years.

If a person belongs in Section 19, check whether they also fit Section 18 or Section 20B. The form lets you cross-reference. Take that option. It saves the investigator time and signals you are thorough.

For the full SF-86 walkthrough including how long the whole form takes, see the SF-86 form explained. For who goes in your references section (Section 16, not Section 19), see how to pick your three SF-86 references.

What About the Polygraph and TS/SCI Cases?

If you are headed for a TS/SCI clearance, Section 19 takes on extra weight. The investigation runs deeper. Some agencies follow up with a polygraph. The foreign contacts question comes up in that interview almost every time.

Polygraph examiners are not trying to catch you in a relationship. They are trying to confirm what you wrote is complete. If your SF-86 lists three foreign contacts and the polygraph surfaces a fourth you forgot, that does not automatically deny you. But it forces a conversation. The conversation goes better when nothing was hidden.

We cover the polygraph in more detail in our piece on the security clearance polygraph. The short version: do not lie on the form so you do not have to manage a lie under exam.

For the broader picture of what TS/SCI gets you on the civilian side, see TS/SCI clearance levels and civilian value. And for who pays for the clearance itself, see our top secret clearance cost breakdown.

How Do I Prep Section 19 Before Opening e-QIP?

Do not open e-QIP and start typing. Draft your answers first. Here is the sequence I have seen work for service members and contractors filling out the form for the first time.

The full e-QIP system is run by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency. You can read the official guidance on the DCSA e-QIP page. The Office of Personnel Management hosts the actual SF-86 form PDF if you want to review the questions before logging in.

What Should I Do Next?

You came to this page worried that listing foreign contacts would tank your case. The opposite is true. The applicants who get cleared faster are the ones who list everything correctly the first time.

Draft your Section 19 entries before you open e-QIP. Apply the four-bond test. Be thorough. Be specific. Do not minimize, do not editorialize, do not hide.

If you are using the clearance process to bridge into a federal civilian or contractor role after the military, your federal resume is the other half of that equation. BMR''s Federal Resume Builder is built around the OPM data the federal hiring side actually uses. It walks you through the translation from military experience to federal language and produces a resume that matches the announcements you are applying to. The free tier covers two tailored federal resumes, two cover letters, and a LinkedIn optimization pass.

Section 19 is not the boss it feels like at first. Treat it as a list of facts you already know. Write it the way you would tell a buddy across the table. The form is built to handle truth. Give it that, and the investigation moves.